Thursday, 19 March 2020

A Review of Kaizen


A Review of Kaizen

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya
BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM
Chairman and Managing Director,
MultiSpectra Consultants,
23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,
Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.
Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com


Kaizen is a concept referring to business activities that continuously improve all functions and involve all employees from the CEO to the assembly line workers. Kaizen (改善) is the Sino-Japanese word for "improvement". Kaizen also applies to processes, such as purchasing and logistics, that cross organisational boundaries into the supply chain.

By improving standardised programmes and processes, kaizen aims to eliminate waste (lean manufacturing). Kaizen was first practised in Japanese businesses after World War II, influenced in part by American business and quality-management teachers, and most notably as part of The Toyota Way. It has since spread throughout the world and has been applied to environments outside business and productivity.

The Japanese word kaizen means "change for better", without inherent meaning of either "continuous" or "philosophy" in Japanese dictionaries and in everyday use. The word refers to any improvement, one-time or continuous, large or small, in the same sense as the English word "improvement". However, given the common practice in Japan of labelling industrial or business improvement techniques with the word "kaizen", particularly the practices spearheaded by Toyota, the word "kaizen" in English is typically applied to measures for implementing continuous improvement, especially those with a "Japanese philosophy". The discussion below focuses on such interpretations of the word, as frequently used in the context of modern management discussions. Two kaizen approaches have been distinguished:

Point Kaizen

It is one of the most commonly implemented types of Kaizen. It happens very quickly and usually without much planning. As soon as something is found broken or incorrect, quick and immediate measures are taken to correct the issues.

These measures are generally small, isolated and easy to implement, however they can have a huge impact.

In some cases, it is also possible that the positive effects of point kaizen in one area can reduce or eliminate benefits of point Kaizen in some other area. An example of Point Kaizen could be a shop inspection by a supervisor and he finds broken materials or other small issues, and then asks the owner of the shop to perform a quick Kaizen (5S) to rectify those issues.

System Kaizen

System Kaizen is accomplished in an organised manner and is devised to address system level problems in an organisation.

It is an upper level strategic planning method which results in a number of planned Kaizen events over a long period of time. It is in contrast to point Kaizen which generally happens as a result of identification of a small issue which is resolved in a short period of time.

Line Kaizen

Line in this context refers to a structured spreading of Lean from point or discrete to the line. For example, Kaizen might be applied to a process (point), but also to the downstream process. Those two points constitute a Line Kaizen.

Another example might be in Lean implemented in procurement, but also being implemented in the planning department. Here in this case, planning is upstream from procurement and Kaizen is performed at those two points, which thus forms a line.

Plane Kaizen

It is the next upper level of Line Kaizen, in that several lines are connected together. In modern terminologies, this can also be described as value stream, where instead of traditional departments, the organisation is structured into product lines or families and value streams. It can be visualised as changes or improvements made to one line being implemented to multiple other lines or processes.

Cube Kaizen

Cube Kaizen describes the situation where all the points of the planes are connected to each other and no point is disjointed from each other. This would resemble a situation where Lean has spread across the entire organisation. Improvements are made up and down through the plane, or upstream or downstream, including the complete organisation, suppliers and customers. This might require some changes in the standard business processes as well.

Kaizen is a daily process, the purpose of which goes beyond simple productivity improvement. It is also a process that, when done correctly, humanises the workplace, eliminates overly hard work, and teaches people how to perform experiments on their work using the scientific method and how to learn to spot and eliminate waste in business processes. In all, the process suggests a humanised approach to workers and to increasing productivity: "The idea is to nurture the company's people as much as it is to praise and encourage participation in kaizen activities." Successful implementation requires "the participation of workers in the improvement." People at all levels of an organization participate in kaizen, from the CEO down to janitorial staff, as well as external stakeholders when applicable. Kaizen is most commonly associated with manufacturing operations, as at Toyota, but has also been used in non-manufacturing environments. The format for kaizen can be individual, suggestion system, small group or large group. At Toyota, it is usually a local improvement within a workstation or local area and involves a small group in improving their own work environment and productivity. This group is often guided through the kaizen process by a line supervisor; sometimes this is the line supervisor's key role. Kaizen on a broad, cross-departmental scale in companies, generates total quality management and frees human efforts through improving productivity using machines and computing power.

While kaizen (at Toyota) usually delivers small improvements, the culture of continual aligned small improvements and standardisation yields large results in terms of overall improvement in productivity. This philosophy differs from the "command and control" improvement programmes (e.g., Business Process Improvement) of the mid-20th century. Kaizen methodology includes making changes and monitoring results, then adjusting. Large-scale pre-planning and extensive project scheduling are replaced by smaller experiments, which can be rapidly adapted as new improvements are suggested.

In modern usage, it is designed to address a particular issue over the course of a week and is referred to as a "kaizen blitz" or "kaizen event". These are limited in scope, and issues that arise from them are typically used in later blitzes. A person who makes a large contribution in the successful implementation of kaizen during kaizen events is awarded the title of "Zenkai". In the 21st century, business consultants in various countries have engaged in widespread adoption and sharing of the Kaizen framework as a way to help their clients restructure and refocus their business processes.

History

The small-step work improvement approach was developed in the USA under Training Within Industry programme (TWI Job Methods). Instead of encouraging large, radical changes to achieve desired goals, these methods recommended that organisations introduce small improvements, preferably ones that could be implemented on the same day. The major reason was that during World War II there was neither time nor resources for large and innovative changes in the production of war equipment. The essence of the approach came down to improving the use of the existing workforce and technologies.

As part of the Marshall Plan after World War II, American occupation forces brought in experts to help with the rebuilding of Japanese industry while the Civil Communications Section (CCS) developed a management training programme that taught statistical control methods as part of the overall material. Homer Sarasohn and Charles Protzman developed and taught this course in 1949–1950. Sarasohn recommended W. Edwards Deming for further training in statistical methods.

The Economic and Scientific Section (ESS) group was also tasked with improving Japanese management skills and Edgar McVoy was instrumental in bringing Lowell Mellen to Japan to properly install the Training Within Industry (TWI) programs in 1951. The ESS group had a training film to introduce TWI's three "J" programs: Job Instruction, Job Methods and Job Relations. Titled "Improvement in Four Steps" (Kaizen eno Yon Dankai), it thus introduced kaizen to Japan.

For the pioneering, introduction and implementation of kaizen in Japan, the Emperor of Japan awarded the Order of the Sacred Treasure to Dr. Deming in 1960. Subsequently, the Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) instituted the annual Deming Prizes for achievement in quality and dependability of products. On October 18, 1989, JUSE awarded the Deming Prize to Florida Power and Light Co. (FPL), based in the US, for its exceptional accomplishments in process and quality-control management, making it the first company outside Japan to win the Deming Prize.

Implementation

The Toyota Production System is known for kaizen, where all line personnel are expected to stop their moving production line in case of any abnormality and, along with their supervisor, suggest an improvement to resolve the abnormality which may initiate a kaizen.

The PDCA cycles

The cycle of kaizen activity can be defined as: "Plan → Do → Check → Act". This is also known as the Shewhart cycle, Deming cycle or PDCA.

Another technique used in conjunction with PDCA is the 5 Whys, which is a form of root cause analysis in which the user asks a series of five "why" questions about a failure that has occurred, basing each subsequent question on the answer to the previous. There are normally a series of causes stemming from one root cause, and they can be visualised using fishbone diagrams or tables. The Five Whys can be used as a foundational tool in personal improvement, or as a means to create wealth.

Masaaki Imai made the term famous in his book Kaizen: The Key to Japan's Competitive Success.

In the Toyota Way Fieldbook, Liker and Meier discuss the kaizen blitz and kaizen burst (or kaizen event) approaches to continuous improvement. A kaizen blitz, or rapid improvement, is a focused activity on a particular process or activity. The basic concept is to identify and quickly remove waste. Another approach is that of the kaizen burst, a specific kaizen activity on a particular process in the value stream. Kaizen facilitators generally go through training and certification before attempting a Kaizen project.

In the 1990s, Professor Iwao Kobayashi published his book 20 Keys to Workplace Improvement and created a practical, step-by-step improvement framework called "the 20 Keys". He identified 20 operations focus areas which should be improved to attain holistic and sustainable change. He went further and identified the 5 levels of implementation for each of these 20 focus areas. 4 of the focus areas are called Foundation Keys. According to the 20 Keys, these foundation keys should be launched ahead of the others in order to form a strong constitution in the company. The four foundation keys are:

Key 1 – Cleaning and Organising to Make Work Easy, which is based on the 5S methodology.
Key 2 – Goal Alignment/Rationalising the System
Key 3 – Small Group Activities
Key 4 – Leading and Site Technology

© MultiSpectra Consultants, 2020.

Saturday, 7 March 2020

How Enterprise Architecture Relates to Lean Startup


How Enterprise Architecture Relates to Lean Startup

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya
BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM
Chairman and Managing Director,
MultiSpectra Consultants,
23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,
Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.
Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com


Lean Startup is a flexible approach to starting a startup that aids the product development cycle. As stated in Harvard Business Review, “It is a methodology that favors experimentation over elaborate planning, customer feedback over intuition, and iterative design over traditional ‘big design up front’ development.” This is to say that to assess our businesses we simply go ahead with a Google form survey, instead of using complex business evaluation techniques like SWOT or STP analysis.

What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)?

But all this may seem too dreamy without a conceptual blueprint. EA is an ongoing management process that determines how an organisation can most effectively achieve and transition from its current to its future objectives. EA logically prioritises resources available and presents a framework of the organisation that enables entrepreneurs to think about different aspects of their business. It empowers them to link their existing strengths to see where they fit in the business canvas and can connect with the external environment. For instance, let us say there are three departments HR, Finance, IT and Marketing within an organisation. Enterprise architecture presents details about how every department can be strategically made to function in synthesis to maximise the potential of the organisation.

Integration of both our concepts: Lean Startup and EA

Both Lean Startup and EA are dynamic concepts involving continuous evolution but at the same time they are starkly different. While Lean Startup is about constantly revamping business models and making new strategies as per the needs of the customer, enterprise architecture improvises existing strategic plans to align business demands with IT. Both concepts when applied individually are conducive to business growth, but when used together they can move mountains.

The synchronization of the two equips entrepreneurs with a mindset to continuously renovate the enterprise architecture instead of building one that will take years to develop into a perfect ideal.

Global overview

Internationally, the driving force behind world’s most successful businesses such as Amazon has been its obsession with its customers. This fixation has led to intimate customer bonding which encourages them to not only stay loyal to the company but also give back to the company in the form of constant feedback about their expectations from it. Bezos believes that, “Everyone has to be able to work in a call center” so that they have insight into the customer’s perspective. As such, each year he and thousands of Amazon managers attend two days of call center training and field calls periodically. Taking customer opinion at the right time prevents wastage of time and resources.

Dropbox is another multi-billion dollar business that minimised the time of its product development cycle by a virtual display of the product seeking opinion polls. To estimate if the demand for their product was sufficient to go ahead with the actual product development they asked for e-mail addresses of potential beta users.

But how do we integrate the two?

Following are a few ways by which entrepreneurial teams can look at incorporating the two:

The melting point of an Enterprise Architecture and a Lean Startup comes in when the synchronization of the two equips entrepreneurs with a mindset to continuously renovate the enterprise instead of building towards a virtual ideal to be in the next few years.

Create an outline of IT assets and business processes with an objective to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the business.
Set in place governance principles that drive an ongoing discussion about business strategy and how it can be expressed through IT.

The Lean Startup approach aka ‘Build-Measure-Learn’, aims to increase the value to customers while using fewer resources:
a. Phase 1: Build
Includes launching a minimum viable product (MVP), which could be just a virtual representation of the product to gauge potential users’ interest. MVP revolves around the dominant question of our time: whether the product should be built and not can it be built?
b. Phase 2: Measure
After evaluating the level of interest, it is essential to determine if the demand is sustainable to:
>To continue product development?
>If it is continued, what attributes should be added or refined?
c. Phase 3: Learn
Finally, after compiling potential users’ feedback, the last decision making point is whether to persevere or pivot. It encompasses the critical factor of changing product strategy or shutting down development entirely. Eric Ries who coined the term ‘Lean Startup’, believes that the future of a startup must not be analysed by the burn per month but by number of pivot opportunities left undiscovered.

© MultiSpectra Consultants, 2020.

There is More to Startups than Technology


There is More to Startups than Technology

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya
BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM
Chairman and Managing Director,
MultiSpectra Consultants,
23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,
Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.
Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com


Each time an aspiring entrepreneur walks up to me and says “I have a brilliant idea that can change the world”, I start getting worried! Even a brief probe then, invariably reveals that the aspirant wants to pursue this idea because he faced a certain problem and could not find a ready solution and now thinks that the solution (which in reality is no more than an idea – yet to even arrive at a ‘proof-of-concept’ stage) is not only going to solve this problem but in fact, the whole world is dying for this incredible value position to arrive.

This is symptomatic of most technologists who get a ‘kick’ out of solving a technical problem and presume that there is a ready market waiting for their solution. The truth, unfortunately, is far from it. Starting out to solve a problem without listening to the ‘voice of the (potential) customer’ is a guaranteed recipe for failure. This is in no way to undermine the brilliance and technical capabilities that the individual and the team may have in building a very good product or service. However, most entrepreneurs (especially those who start off without any work experience or exposure to the real world of business) come to discover the harsh truth after having staked considerable time, effort, and money – more importantly career opportunities – in the hope that they will become a unicorn very soon, the media will write exciting stories about them and they would have ‘arrived’ in the name and fame world.

Getting under the skin of the customer is the most crucial part of any entrepreneurial venture - irrespective of whether it is technology-based or not. The more the entrepreneur understands and lives through the ‘pain-point’ of the customer, the more he is likely to craft an appropriate value proposition for the customer. And mind you, the ‘customer’ here implies not just somebody who sees/experiences/uses the value of the solution but has both; the ability, as well as the willingness to pay for it.

Working with customers in the earlier phase of ideation and iterating to fulfilling what might be the bare minimum customer expectation, is the starting point. No product ever arrives at the ‘final version’ in one go. It is often a long, painstaking journey with multiple iterations and tweaks even before one can ‘pilot’ it on an alpha (early adapter) or a beta customer.

With ‘products’ more particularly (as opposed to services), there is an emerging concept of co-creating - which means constantly engaging with the actual user all the time before one arrives at a reasonably acceptable PoC and probably have a few samples or mock-ups that can be ruggedly tried and tested under various user conditions. Productionising it and going-to-market is a completely different next big challenge and very complex as opposed to coming from idea-to-PoC.

My motivation to write this piece is that I increasingly find a number of bright aspiring entrepreneurs wanting to ride the band wagon in haste and unrealistic hope. While it is certainly good to dream and aspire to become a successful entrepreneur someday and make a difference to the world around us, one must tread the path with care and caution. Not every bright engineer or scientist is cut out to be an entrepreneur and neither does the ability to solve or crack a complex technical problem automatically guarantee that you turn out to be a successful entrepreneur. There is a lot more to entrepreneurship than merely being able to master technology.

For now, I wish to leave you with just one message – start with the customer and not with the technology that you think you are great at – your chances of success then, are likely to be so much better.

Good luck!

© MultiSpectra Consultants, 2020.

Developing Different Asset Classes for Startup Financing Other Than Venture Capital


Developing Different Asset Classes for Startup Financing Other Than Venture Capital

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya
BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM
Chairman and Managing Director,
MultiSpectra Consultants,
23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,
Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.
Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com


Venture Capitalism has become a major necessity for startups, with it being the only source that allows a startup to transition from and to different stages of its life. However, there are certain restrictions that come hand in hand with its vitality. Venture capitalism involves professionally managed funds offering startups funds for equity. They usually exit when an IPO happens or upon an acquisition. The VCs, at times, force startups to take directions that the original entrepreneurs may not have wanted. Moreover, the endeavour of getting the VC’s attention and confidence is a momentous task in itself. Therefore, it becomes crucial to develop different asset classes to allow for a greater spectrum of options for nascent start-ups.

There is a spectrum of alternative options, that involves either conventional sources of asset classes and potential sources of funds.

Bootstrapping: This process involves an entrepreneur using his own finances to facilitate the initial working of his startup. In order to bootstrap effectively, entrepreneurs need to refine their operations so as to be very cost efficient so they can utilise their revenue growth to fuel future investments as well.

Crowd funding: Crowd funding involves a business putting its idea on a platform where different individuals pledge different amounts to the success of the project. However, crowd funding is highly competitive and the business idea must be fully formed and tested. Crowd funding serves a dual purpose as marketing as well as financing. Crowd Funding platforms are relatively new with their development in their nascent stages in countries like India. To make these avenues feasible, there is a need to create awareness among people.

Angel investors : Angel investors are individuals who provide a one-time boost in the form of funding to a startup. They are usually either family members or friends of the individual. Angel investors are simply informal investors that are more fixated on the growth of the startup as opposed to immediate profit needs. Unlike venture capitalists, angel investors usually invest their own money. Therefore, there is greater likelihood of the goals of the investors and the startup being in tandem.

Private lending: Borrowing money from either conventional banks or specially-designed financial institutions that fund small and medium businesses is also an alternative. These loans however increase the firm’s financial risk which restrict a company’s ability to scale or take operational risks. However, loans do come at a benefit of having no dilution of ownership.

This particular alternative needs a lot more refinement and development in reality. Banks often do not have confidence in new startups or lend to them at predatory rates. This, more often than not, leads to a startup’s demise. However, this opens a window of opportunity for us to come up with a different metric for assessing if a startup inspires confidence or not. This new threshold can help actualise this alternative. The right trend can be seen when we see the arrival of institutions specifically designed to encourage startups.

The above are asset classes designed specifically for startups to help facilitate their growth. However we can look at this issue in another way as well.

The conventional class of financial assets namely equities, bonds, real estate, etc. are options that accommodate startups. Upon understanding the constraints that lie in this access, we can better develop these options as possible alternatives as well.

Startups are relatively unknown and often operate under tight liquidity positions. This means that they find it difficult to raise capital from the market. Also, the entire procedure of getting listed and the formalities also eliminate these options.

There are a few possible avenues to eliminate these constraints:

Convertible Bonds: Convertible bonds start as normal bonds with a given interest rate. However, after some time investors have the avenue to covert them onto a profit-sharing instrument. Startups have trouble getting credit due to their lack of credit history. However, when they try to raise money by equity they face several problems regarding valuation. This allows startups to co-opt the best of both these choices by giving lenders the avenue to convert their debt into equity after a certain time. This acts as an additional re-assurance and is cheaper than raising money from equity.

Startup Stock Market: There has been the starting of a new era of startups globally with the arrival of platforms designed specifically to trade share-equivalents of startups. This model is still in its nascent stages as seen in the startup stock exchange; however, if developed this gives startups access to equity.

Therefore, there are several avenues available to startups other than venture capitalism whether conventional avenues like bootstrapping or new innovations like convertible bonds. Eventually, a startup can also refine its own functioning to generate funds by having pre-order option for products, etc. Every aspect of the startup is capable of being a potential source of financing.

© MultiSpectra Consultants, 2020.

Targeted Interventions: How Modern Day Firms Are Increasing ‘Business Impact’


Targeted Interventions: How Modern Day Firms Are Increasing ‘Business Impact’

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya
BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM
Chairman and Managing Director,
MultiSpectra Consultants,
23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,
Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.
Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com


Corporate Training and Learning Development programmes have primarily focused on broader training gaps in the past without the ability to ‘Penetrate’ and reach the core issue that needs attention.

Why cannot Training be precisely attuned to the need that an organisation has? Why is it that we see blanket Training Interventions that add very little value to solving the core problem that the organisation has? Organisations continue to ‘Carpet Bombard’ a group of like roles and expect results whereas the need is to be targeted with a ‘Surgeons’ Knife Precision’ approach in identifying the areas that need urgent attention.

There is an unmet need when assessing what Training Intervention needs to be prioritised first and where the likely Business Impact that will yield maximum ROI is.

Most of the Training Interventions attract diverse audiences, but the best training interventions ‘Target’ a specific need that is specific to an organisation at a given point in time. Finding the right Targeted Training Need(s) and further customising the Training Interventions such that specific levers are leveraged is a challenge that every organisation grapples with.

Successful organisations in the new age have found the solution to the talent war: a highly ‘Customised and Targeted’ learning environment. The operative keyword being ‘Targeted.'

Successful organisations demonstrate the ability to create an ecosystem for learning and development that supports individualised training needs.

Targeted Training Interventions demand the use of established methods in identifying the training gaps, often going to the level of most basic building blocks. A Targeted Training intervention weaves the ingredients of Technology, Business Strategies and Learning Objectives to create something that is highly tailored and effective in a real-world scenario.

The Design and Development process of a Targeted Training intervention requires a very meticulous understanding of the underlying business model, the services / products being delivered and the nuances of integrating PEOPLE, PROCESS and TECHNOLOGY.

SOMM (Stuvoy Organisational Maturity Model) is one such Framework and a Roadmap Model that makes possible the measurement of the maturity of PEOPLE, PROCESSES and TECHNOLOGY. The term maturity in SOMM refers to the organisation's readiness and experience about the three core pillars: Human Capital (PEOPLE), PROCESSES and TECHNOLOGY.

With the availability of established frameworks and models such as SOMM, getting the right identification of a Training Intervention is a ‘Breeze’ for any organisation. With SOMM, organisations can look forward to impacting ‘Targeted’ business areas that have been a pain and have prevented the organisations from improving their Productivity, Quality, Reducing the Costs to market and an overall higher Retention of the client via higher satisfaction across services and products offered.

With Targeted investments in improving People, Processes and Technology, organisations are continuously and successfully sharpening the competitive ‘axe’ required to survive and thrive in the modern-day competitive world.

© MultiSpectra Consultants, 2020.

How Startups Can Protect their Intellectual Property using their IPR


How Startups Can Protect their Intellectual Property using their IPR

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya
BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM
Chairman and Managing Director,
MultiSpectra Consultants,
23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,
Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.
Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com


It is an overwhelming process once you set out to start a new business. It may leave you in doubts, anxiety and a ton of other legitimate issues. One of the major areas that businesses need to stay aware about is Intellectual Property Rights. Once the fundamentals of deciding the right business structure are cleared, IPR helps to differentiate your business from those of your competitors. IPR yields you the following advantages

Can sell or licence for creating an additional revenue stream.
Offer distinctive products / services to your customers.
It can become an essential part of your marketing or branding (Exclusivity).
Intellectual properties are assets that you can use as security against loans.
Consider exploiting your IP to the fullest as it makes more sense to secure your business in the best possible manner. You can legally protect your Intellectual Property in the following manners:

Protecting Intellectual Property against any sort of infringement by others.
You can defend it in a court of law to claim your sole right on it.
Can legally stop others from using, making, selling or importing without your agreement.
You can earn royalties by licensing it or make money selling it.
Use your trademark for strategic alliances.
Essentially, there are three different ways through which a new business can secure its Intellectual Properties. This could be anything – a thought, an idea, an item, images, process, logos and so forth that represents a brand.

Here are the types of IPR that businesses can avail:

1. Copyrights

Certain protection is automatically granted to the author for their original, creative or intellectual work. Know more about copyright registration in India to ensure taking correct steps in the right direction.

Works include; Books, lectures, dramatic and musical works, cinematography, drawings, paintings, architecture, sculpture, photographs, illustrations, maps, plans, sketches, etc.

Rights: To distribute copies or phonorecords of the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease or lending and to perform the work publicly in person or through an audio transmission.

Validity: It is not mandatory to register but it is highly recommended. The validity of copyright lasts the lifetime of the author and even till the 60 years after his death. The owner is given protection in most countries.

2. Trademarks

Trademark: At first, register trademark online as this acts as a brand element distinguishing your goods and services from those of your competitors and other traders in the market. It creates a distinct identity for your company and thereby securing a brand from being counterfeited.

Marks: Word mark, a logo mark or a slogan, shapes, and unconventional marks like colours, sounds, gestures, animation, holograms, etc. can be registered under trademark.

Rights: Gives exclusive right to use the mark and prevent anyone from using it without permission. The owner also enjoys the right to licence, assign and sell the mark in return for compensation.

Validity: 10 years which can be made perpetual, as along as it is renewed every 10 years. Should be applied separately in every country in which protection is required and has a market in.

3. Patents

Patents come into play when you are looking to protect a new invention that is original and can be used to simplify the lives of people.

Condition: Patent requires an idea to be novel and unique. Industrial procedures can be patented especially if a non-obvious step is introduced in it.

Rights: It gives an exclusive authority over the patented invention, the right to exclude others and exploit the patent and earn from it.

Validity: Patent protection is a territorial right and therefore it is effective only within the territory of India (or the country where applied). Separate patents are required to be filed for each country where the protection is required. A patent is valid for a period of 20 years after which it goes into the public domain.

It is best to consider IP as something that offers an additional advantage that is beyond the concept of making money or even branding for that matter. It is something with which the business esteem is connected. Insuring the intellectual property is also a common norm since it is an asset. One of the quintessential business components is to have IP protection as a part of budgeting and business plan as well.

Startup Valuation can be made on the Basis of IP Rights
New companies do not have great stocks of products or workforce to begin with. Subsequently, a large portion of the estimation of a startup, for the most part, gets from their IP rights. It has been assessed that, normally, over 80% of the estimation of a new business depends on their IP portfolio.

No Over-Stretching the Finances
Unless your startup offers something that has zero creation costs, you will need to tighten the pocket heavily even to make start making profits. Another aspect that businesses do not consider is the cost associated with not taking proper care of their intellectual properties.

Impose Control on What You Have
Many businesses echo this - "we could not care less on the off chance that somebody duplicates us, it is simply free promoting!” and this gets me winced on many occasions.

Certainly, it is pleasant to have some other businesses advancing your administrations or merchandise for nothing. But then, what about the copy that does not match or justify the standards that you offer? Practically, you can do "nothing" in such an event and your brand may have to suffer an irreversible loss.

On one hand, the new business has a highly dynamic environment but the competition and technology are at peak. One has to remain on edge every time to protect your intellectual property from being used for other substandard products and services. Protecting your IPR is the best and the only way that helps you to create a sustainable and defensible differentiator in a highly competitive market.

© MultiSpectra Consultants, 2020.

Did Nagarjuna Write the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra or at Least a Part of It?


Did Nagarjuna Write the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra or at Least a Part of It?

Dr. Amartya Kumar Bhattacharya
BCE (Hons.) ( Jadavpur ), MTech ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), PhD ( Civil ) ( IIT Kharagpur ), Cert.MTERM ( AIT Bangkok ), CEng(I), FIE, FACCE(I), FISH, FIWRS, FIPHE, FIAH, FAE, MIGS, MIGS – Kolkata Chapter, MIGS – Chennai Chapter, MISTE, MAHI, MISCA, MIAHS, MISTAM, MNSFMFP, MIIBE, MICI, MIEES, MCITP, MISRS, MISRMTT, MAGGS, MCSI, MIAENG, MMBSI, MBMSM
Chairman and Managing Director,
MultiSpectra Consultants,
23, Biplabi Ambika Chakraborty Sarani,
Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal, INDIA.
Website: https://multispectraconsultants.com


Did Nagarjuna write the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra or at least a part of it?

It is known that all Mahayana Sutras have anonymous authors. The Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra is one of the earliest Mahayana Sutras and some of its material meshes well with what Nagarjuna wrote. For example, Nagarjuna in his Mula Madhyamaka Karika, at one point refutes both Atman and Anatman. This is also found in the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra. This contradicts what Lord Buddha said because Lord Buddha denied Atman and preached Anatman.

It is not known which or who is earlier, the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra or Nagarjuna. If the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra is earlier, then there is a very strong chance that Nagarjuna read it and was strongly influenced by it. If, on the other hand, Nagarjuna was earlier, the possibility that Nagarjuna wrote the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra, or at least a part of it, cannot be discounted.

Certainly, Nagarjuna may have written one or more Mahayana Sutras in addition to the works attributed to him, for example, Mula Madhyamaka Karika, Vigrahavyavartani, Achintyastava and Lokatitastava, just to name a few. All four of the above writings of Nagarjuna are extanct in Sanskrit and Nagarjuna's exposition of the philosophy of emptiness can be clearly found in them. Nagarjuna also wrote works like Shunyatasaptati which are not available in Sanskrit. Nagarjuna refers to Lord Buddha's sermon to Kachchana in Chapter 15 of his Mula Madhyamaka Karika. It is well known that Nagarjuna was writing at a time when Mahayana Buddhism was evolving. Mahayana Sutras of that period tend to be hybrid texts, combining traditional Buddhist teachings with new innovative concepts.

However, while the emptiness portion of the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra fits in well with Mula Madhyamika Karika, the Bodhichitta mentioned in the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra does not. This makes one rethink the whole scenario and conclude that even if Nagarjuna had a hand in writing the Mahayana Kashyapa Parivarta Sutra, he probably wrote only a part of it. There is no evidence in any of the authored works of Nagarjuna that Nagarjuna ever changed his worldview significantly. Therefore, we have to compare any Mahayana Sutra which we suspect Nagarjuna with having written with Nagarjuna's authored works to arrive at some sort of opinion as to whether Nagarjuna had a hand in writing the Mahayana Sutra in question. For example, the Mahayana Shrimala Sutra is an early Mahayana Sutra and it is cited by the later Mahayana Lankavatara Sutra as well as by the Mahayana Sutralankara Bhashya. But the Mahayana Shrimala Sutra's concept of Tathagatagarbha does not conform at all with Nagarjuna's concept of lack of Swabhava, self-nature, in all things. Therefore, Nagarjuna may safely be passed over as the author or one of the authors of the Mahayana Shrimala Sutra.

What I have mentioned about Nagarjuna applies to Mahayana Buddhist scholars and saints in general. Besides their authored works, they may have written Mahayana Sutras. At this point of time, we have no way to tell.

The Mahayana Sutras themselves give us some clues as to their place of writing. The Mahayana Lankavatara Sutra and the Mahayana Gandavyuha Sutra point to the south as the place of writing while the Mahayana Amitabha-vyuha Sutra, which brought into existence Amitabha Buddha, was most probably composed in the north with considerable Zoroastrian influence because both the Zoroastrian god Ahura Mazda and Amitabha Buddha are associated with luminosity. In fact, the name Amitabha means 'Unbounded Light'. His other name is Amitayus meaning 'Unbounded Life'. The Mahayana Saddharma Pundarika Sutra, or Lotus Sutra, was certainly written later than the Mahayana Amitabha-vyuha Sutra because it already refers to Amitabha Buddha. Silk, which at that point of time could only have come from China, is mentioned in the Lotus Sutra and some other Mahayana Sutras as well indicating that the anonymous authors of these Mahayana Sutras lived in places where there was trade with China.

Nagarjuna's main claim to fame is his being the founder of the Madhyamika school of Mahayana Buddhism, a school which bifurcated into the Prasangika Madhyamika, typically represented by Buddhapalita and Chandrakirti, and Swatantrika Madhyamika, typically represented by Bhavaviveka, in later times.

© Bhattacharya International Buddhist Foundation, 2020.